🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency sparked by the presentation of a new comprehensive peace framework for achieving ceasefire appeared – momentarily – to have been stabilised. A American diplomat spoke of "substantial progress" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its countermove: another massive barrage of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Peace Talks and Military Action

The succession of conflicting incidents captured the grim essence of the outgoing year. By day, diplomatic battles are conducted: optimistic declarations are issued from multiple capitals. Considerable effort is devoted on restraining specific proposals. By night, Russian leadership brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the main instrument for achieving "peace".

Nighttime Reality

As Russia's attack unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's exposure was laid bare. Ukraine is able to track projectile deployments from Russian territory, a capacity provided through up-to-date information. From observation points, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been dispatched to engage hostile aerial threats flew past – sophisticated military planes delivered to Ukraine by European allies.

Shortly after, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: multiple launches deployed against a hostile projectile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably supplied through allied countries. Every launch jolts you unexpectedly, rattling buildings. The brief panic quickly becomes grim resignation: maybe the approaching threat won't strike its target this time, sparing the city from ruin and further power outages.

Persistent Threats

Not long after, a automatic firearm fired at a drone somewhere nearby, part of a defensive team – probably imported technology. Regrettably, the bullets missed the enemy aircraft – it pressed on overhead toward its objective.

With pauses, this continued until dawn. Kyiv faced the morning news: several casualties, devastation and heating outages in multiple buildings as a result of the night's assault. As typically, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's critical military reliance on international aid – a need that European nations are evidently unprepared to fill in the immediate future.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The comprehensive proposal from Washington generated strong feelings, debate and profound anxiety – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's major integrity crisis in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after prior negotiation attempts and multilateral gatherings.

Every new approach from Washington unfolds according to the identical sequence: a political offensive against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, manages to fend off. They contain the crisis but never actually achieve victory. This cycle will, undoubtedly, continue.

Tactical Assessments

It is tempting to accuse particular leaders of repeatedly advocating Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the whole story. Washington functions according to a premise understood by experienced diplomats: you cannot secure via talks what you have failed to defend militarily. The White House believes that it is impossible to force Russia to abandon the areas that it presently holds in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The problem is that while acknowledging this situation, Washington does minimal to deter Moscow, through diplomacy or military means, from believing that the situation will not shift further in its advantage in the coming year.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, the Kremlin is confident that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its supporters are approaching exhaustion. Their incentive to sign a deal that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is virtually nonexistent. There may be numerous efforts to end hostilities, but they will persist as long as Russia's government remains supremely confident in the result.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still hold out, progressively conceding lives and land but averting a total frontline collapse until situations evolve in its advantage.

Current Realities

Realistically, there are no real preconditions for a armistice. Now, subjective factors are coming into play: personal goals to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the flag against any proposal Kyiv finds unsuitable, so that their focus does not move to homefront challenges. And although their objective will now be significantly challenging after latest incidents, it remains quite doubtful that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These two forces are driving the talks.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a only one week to eliminate the 28 points of the latest plan. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by American leadership, resistance by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with calming attempts of representatives, and finally, recent disclosures, all did their job.

While new initiatives based on old ideas are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and reflect specific hesitation to change the course of events, if they stand together and strengthen their defence capabilities at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the predictable period, primarily depend on ongoing international assistance.